|
Youth Development: The Euro Stars
When a third of your country lies below sea level, you need a little
blue sky thinking to keep your head above water. Fortunately that’s an
area in which the Dutch are masters. For more than a thousand years
this tiny country has achieved the impossible and successfully
reclaimed land from the ocean. In football, their accomplishments have
been similarly miraculous. With a population numbering fewer than 15
million, a professional league only 50 years old and a comparative lack
of financial resources, they have managed to consistently compete
against the bigger nations of Planet Football. How? By becoming experts
in youth development.
No other country in the world has squeezed so much talent from such
scarce resources as Holland. And if it’s Ajax who have a reputation as
Europe’s premier producer of youth talent, the truth is that in every
corner of this tiny nation, clubs are producing top-class footballers –
and they have been doing for years.
“Ajax were always known for homegrown players,” says Andy Roxburgh,
the former Scotland manager who is now UEFA’s technical director. “They
had wise old heads like Rinus Michels, Leo Beenhakker and Louis van
Gaal who paid a lot of attention to the youth teams and talked a lot
about grassroots. Rinus would talk about having a ‘red thread’ from the
top of the club to the bottom. Ajax’s youth system was very well
promoted, shall we say, but they certainly weren’t the only club doing
it.”
These days, says Edward Sturing, the head of PSV Eindhoven’s youth
academy, five clubs dominate youth development: Ajax, PSV, Feyenoord,
AZ Alkmaar and Heerenveen. “Across all the age groups, the successful
teams are spread between those five clubs, but no one club dominates,”
adds the former Holland international. “Ajax have a great programme,
but it’s no better than many other clubs.”
The reason, says Roxburgh, is simple: “In Holland, they don’t just
make the kids do training drills. They’re given time to practise on
their own so they can develop individual skills. The preparation that
goes into youth development in Holland is very detailed.”
But what exactly does this detailed preparation involve? Asking the
question to Sturing is like throwing a hungry dog a bone. “OK, let me
show you on my laptop,” he says, dragging FourFourTwo to his desk in
his plush office inside PSV’s youth academy. The next 20 minutes is
like being back at school in a science lesson, as detailed coaching
schedules, diagrams and charts for all the different age-groups flash
before our eyes.
“With our seven to 12-year-olds the first thing we work on is
individual skill, playing on their own,” Sturing explains with gusto.
“Then we move them into one-on-one situations. Then into two attackers
against one defender. After that it’s an eight-versus-eight game
situation where winning is not important and the emphasis is on taking
risks and playing attacking
football. You can see with players like Arjen Robben [a PSV youth product] that this is the way he learnt to play the game.”
This blueprint is not unique to PSV, either: it’s written and handed
down by the KNVB, the Dutch FA, and all the country’s professional
clubs buy into the vision. “When we play 11 versus 11 we must play
4-3-3,” says Sturing, pointing at yet another diagram on his computer.
“It’s a more difficult system, but it’s more flexible and it means
players can adapt more easily.”
The small details are all taken care of. The KNVB states that for
every under-17 team, there must be two head coaches (“It’s a difficult
age, when boys become men,” explains Sturing, pointing at his head),
while at every club there is a dedicated skills coach and, remarkably,
two “co-ordination
trainers”. “The biggest problem for seven to 12-year-olds is ball
control and body control,” explains Sturing, dragging us outside to
illustrate his point.
On the training ground, we find four 12-year-old boys decked out in
distinctive red and white PSV shirts with black shorts. The only time a
ball is used is when they begin a one-handed throwing and catching
exercise. The rest of the time they’re doing roly-polys, handstands and
cartwheels. “You have to be the boss of your own body – and we can
coach that.” Never mind total football, this is total training.
But the top clubs do not work alone. Without the thriving local
football scene they would struggle. There is no organised schools
football, but there are nearly 2500 local clubs of which 95 percent
have a fully functioning youth set-up. Every weekend all those clubs
play competitive matches in the age groups between seven and 19. That’s
a lot of football and a lot of footballers.
“In Holland the pyramid is very big,” explains Sturing, making a
triangle with his two hands. “To have so many local clubs for such a
small country is amazing, because the base of the pyramid is so big
there is a lot of quality at the top.”
So in terms of young players, the Dutch have quality and quantity,
but it’s what they do with the raw materials that gives them an edge.
Few can dispute that the best coaches in the world are produced in
Holland. In 1999, FIFA honoured Rinus Michels as coach of the century.
At last year’s World Cup, there were four Dutch coaches – Marco van
Basten (Holland), Guus Hiddink (Australia), Leo Beenhakker (Trinidad
and Tobago) and Dick Advocaat (South Korea). In contrast there wasn’t a
single Englishman.
In Zeist, just east of Utrecht, the only dedicated coaches’ academy
in the world has been producing top coaches for the past 30 years.
Today, there are more than 100 Dutch coaches working around the world
and if CVs are anything to go by, the best of the current crop is Guus
Hiddink. “Because we are such a small country,” says Hiddink, “we have
to be very inventive. That’s why we get the best out of our young
players and that’s why our training for coaches is long and hard and
spread over many years.”
Youth coaches are particularly valued in Holland, with jobs in a
club’s youth set-up very prestigious. Half of the youth coaches at
Ajax, Feyenoord and PSV are former players. “I think if you want to be
a good coach you need to start right at the bottom,” says Sturing.
“I’ve coached at all the different age groups and it’s the only way you
can make mistakes and try different things. If you start at the top
level you can’t make mistakes because you then have a problem.”
All of this begs the question: if Holland has the best coaches and
the best youth system, why have they never won the World Cup? It’s a
whole different discussion of course, but if there is a criticism of
the Dutch youth system, it’s that there is too much emphasis on skill,
technique and individualism. They may have produced some of the world’s
greatest attacking talents, but can you name a truly world-class Dutch
defender? Henk Span, editor of Dutch football magazine Hard Gras,
certainly struggles. “Ronald Koeman was more a ‘libero’ than a
defender,” he notes. “At the moment Khalid Boulahrouz is regarded as
the best in Holland and he’s not looked good enough at Chelsea.”
But there are other reasons for Holland’s failure on the world’s
biggest stage. “The Dutch are obsessed with playing beautiful
football,” says Span. “We’d rather lose than win by playing ugly and
that’s why we’ve never been world champions.”
One country which has managed to become world champions and play
great football is France. Over the last 10 years alone, they’ve won the
World Cup (1998), the European Championships (2000) and reached another
World Cup Final last year. The reason is simple: they’ve moved ahead of
the rest of Europe in the development of players. On matchday one of
this season’s Champions League, the country with the most players in
the 32 starting line-ups was Brazil with 65. Next was France with 37.
Portugal had 24, Italy 22, Holland 15, Spain 15, England just 14 while
there were only 12 Germans.
That France is now producing more top-quality players than any other
country in Europe is largely down to George Boulogne. In 1966, he sat
down with the French Football Federation and decided the national team
weren’t good enough. So, in 1973, he created the French academy system
that was to lay the foundations for les Bleus becoming world champions
25 years later. Along with the club academies there are now nine
regional elite centres (Clairefontaine is just one), where the best
players spend the week before returning to their clubs at the weekend.
Club academies and regional centres are residential and incorporate
full-time football coaching alongside education.
Former Monaco and Scotland midfielder John Collins believes that
offering quality education at the academies is the key to ensuring
unprecedented access to young footballers. “There is a lot of emphasis
on education because the players live at the academies,” says the Hibs
boss. “They come in at the age of 14 and it’s train, school, train,
school. They are under complete
surveillance all the time so they have to work at their grades. At Monaco there were 14 classrooms within the club’s stadium.”
Over four years, between the age of 12 and 16, a French boy attending
an academy receives 2304 hours of training, twice as much as in
England. But it’s not just more quantity, there’s quality too. “It was
Gerard Houllier’s idea to introduce what is known as ‘preformation’
training,” says Andy Roxburgh. “The idea was that between the ages of
13 and 16 most of the coaching should concentrate on individual work
and developing technique. Gerard believed that if a player got to the
age of 16 and his technique wasn’t up to scratch there was no way of
ever catching up.”
Of course, academies aren’t the only place to play football – Johan
Cruyff and George Best didn’t learnt in an academy, they learnt on the
street – but cultural changes in Europe have seen street football
decline for 20 years. “Marcello Lippi is always bemoaning that kids are
playing far less street football today,” says Roxburgh. “In central and
northern Europe we really need to try and recreate an environment where
there is more spontaneity and freedom of expression with a football.
They play a lot of futsal in Spain and Portugal, which is what the
Brazilians do, and it’s great for the grass roots, but it’s not so big
in Europe. In the past, there were plenty of kids playing in the street
so there were plenty of lads to choose from. Now, though, there have to
be structures in place in order to find the best players.”
Roxburgh’s favourite catchphrase is “chance or design”. As head of
grass roots development for UEFA, he has to be diplomatic about who are
the good, the bad and the ugly when it comes to youth development, but
it doesn’t take a genius to gauge how alarmed he is about certain
countries buying too many foreign players. “You can either take a
chance, buy lots of players and hope they work out,” he says, “or you
can do things by design and produce your own. English clubs have the
money to buy players, and no restrictions on how many they can buy, so
there will always be a glass ceiling for their own academy players.”
Having too much money is a lame excuse, he adds, pointing to the
likes of Real Madrid, Barcelona, Lyon, Manchester United and Inter
Milan as big clubs that are investing heavily in youth. “Most of the
top clubs are doing it now because it’s cheaper in the long run,” he
says. “Barcelona are a great example. [Lionel] Messi is Argentine, but
he’s been with them since he was 12. They’ve produced [Cesc] Fabregas,
Xavi, [Carlos] Puyol and [Andres] Iniesta.”
So if Holland and France have got youth development licked, what
about Spain, a country, like England, with a professional league that
attracts the cream of the world’s football talent?
A glance at the national youth teams’ record makes impressive
reading. "La Seleccion" has won the European Under-17 championship six
times, more than any other country, the UEFA Under-19 title four times
and in 1999, with Iker Casillas in goal and Xavi anchoring the
midfield, they claimed their first ever FIFA World Under-20
Championship.
Spain also boast one of Europe’s best youth clubs – Antiguoko. Never
heard of them? Fans of Liverpool and Everton should sit up and take
note, because both Xabi Alonso and Mikel Arteta are graduates of the
Basque club, whose under-16s made it to the national championship
play-offs this year. Up against the youth sides of Real Madrid,
Barcelona and Espanyol, they eventually lost to a Valencia side which
included two players who had already featured for the first team. That
Antiguoko, an amateur club with no official income and no stadium, even
made it that far was nothing short of miraculous. So good are they at
developing players that Liverpool are trying to sign them up as their
feeder club, a move which is causing a major stink in San Sebastian
because for years Antiguoko have had an agreement with Real Sociedad.
The system in Spain usually has one main club being fed by several
smaller local clubs. The parent club pays the feeder club a “salary”
and that ensures they get first pick of the best players.
“The Spanish system is pretty comprehensive,” says Englishman Phil
Ball, resident of San Sebastian and author of Morbo: The Story of
Spanish Football. “They combine schools football and club football, so
that one weekend the kids will play with the school and a week later
they will play for the local clubs. The coaching is more specialised at
the clubs and the best players at the local clubs then get invited to
train with the professional club, but the school and club teams are
being monitored all the time so nobody can slip through the net.”
One player earning rave reviews in San Sebastian at the moment is an
11-year-old called Harry Ball, Phil’s son (“a chip off the old block”
jokes Ball senior). He’s recently been invited to train with Real
Sociedad. “He’s not allowed to officially play for Real until he’s 14,
so until then he’ll keep
playing for his school and his local club and we’ll see what happens.”
Phil Ball was a half-decent player himself and once had trials for
Lincolnshire County Schools. His experiences in Spain and England
couldn’t be more different. “I found the county system in England very
elitist,” says Ball. “Once you got in the team you stayed there, and
that was that, really. I find it amazing that people in England are
getting upset that plans for an elite academy [the FA’s national centre
at Burton upon Trent] have been shelved. Why should they concentrate on
a small number of top players? They should be spreading the resources
throughout the regions and supporting the local clubs.”
Ball also has some interesting views on the quality of youth football
in Spain compared to England and believes that when it comes to the big
boys, La Liga, and not the Premiership, rules the roost. “Whenever I go
back to England I watch kids of the same age as Harry and the main
emphasis seems to be on running, breaking sweat and kicking the ****
out of each other. It’s like the Premiership. Everybody says that
because three English clubs made it to the semi-finals of the Champions
League the Premiership is the best, but if you’ve got a Russian
oligarch shouldn’t you be expected to make the semi-finals? For me, the
best judge of whether a league has strength in depth is the UEFA Cup,
where the middling teams play each other, and Spain has dominated that
competition for the last two years.”
The year 1995 was a great one for Ajax, but a grave one for Dutch
football. On May 25 at the Ernst Happel Stadium in Vienna, Patrick
Kluivert’s 85th-minute goal against AC Milan earned Ajax their first
European Cup in 22 years. Louis van Gaal’s side, who had won the UEFA
Cup three years before, contained eight homegrown players. Seven months
later, though, the world changed forever. When Belgian footballer
Jean-Marc Bosman won his landmark ruling in 1995, the floodgates were
flung wide open for out-of-contract players in the European Union to
change clubs without a transfer fee. All of a sudden it was almost
impossible for all but the richest clubs to hold on to their best
players beyond the terms of their existing deals.
Within two years of that Champions League triumph in Vienna, seven of
the Ajax players had left to play in England, Spain or Italy. It had
happened before, of course. After their hat-trick of European titles in
the 1970s coach Rinus Michels and the two crucial Johans, Cruyff and
Neeskens, were plying their trade in Barcelona. The difference with the
Bosman ruling was that it gave an unprecedented freedom to all
professional players.
“When I left Holland to play in England I was 27 and already a Dutch
international,” says Arnold Muhren, the former Ajax, Ipswich and
Manchester United midfielder who is now coach of Ajax’s under-14 side.
“These days the players are leaving at 17, 18 and 19.” Muhren points to
Liverpool’s recent signing of 18-year-old Ajax striker Jordy Brouwer as
a typical consequence of the Bosman ruling. “He won’t succeed in
England,” says Muhren with a hint of annoyance in his voice. “He’s a
good player, but he won’t be playing in the first team. He’s so young
and now he’s in country with a completely different culture, so he’ll
be homesick. He’s gone for the money and nothing else. We need to give
these players better and longer contracts so at least if they want to
leave we can get a transfer fee for them. But it all comes down to
money.”
Another consequence of the Bosman ruling and the inexorable rise of
the Champions League is the increasing gap between the rich and poor
clubs. Ajax’s annual turnover is less than £50 million ($118m),
Manchester United’s is £165 million ($388m). The new television deal
for Premiership football will only widen that gap. In a typical display
of Dutch resourcefulness the Amsterdam club have wrestled with the new
challenges facing them and have attempted various changes in strategy.
Ajax have joined the Stock Exchange, dabbled in ideas such as forming a
North Atlantic League, extended their area of influence in the US and
Africa and gambled on buying players on the cheap from Eastern Europe.
But Muhren believes Ajax and the other Dutch clubs must stick to what
they do best – nurturing talent.
“There are now 100 players in the Dutch league who learnt their trade
at Ajax,” says Muhren. “What we are doing is good for Dutch football
and, for me, every penny spent on developing players outside of Holland
is a waste. We have a satellite club, Ajax Cape Town, but the only
decent player to come from there is Steven Pienaar. There’s no doubt
that it’s so much easier for us to mould and coach a Dutch player than
a player from South Africa or Ghana. They have a different mentality
and I think in Norway, Sweden and Denmark they would say the same
thing.”
Johan Cruyff believes Holland is no longer producing the kind of
skilful and exciting players that graced his generation.
Unsurprisingly, his voice holds a lot of sway in the Low Countries, but
on this subject he’s in a minority. “Cruyff is always going on about
the 1970s,” counters Henk Span. “But if you look at our youth teams
from the age of 17 down, they are still winning international
tournaments at all levels.”
What has changed is that the age-old Dutch problem of having a
shortage of good defenders is being addressed and that requires a new
approach which purists like Cruyff despair of. “Before now all players
were selected for their skill and speed,” says Span. “So Ajax signing a
player like Vito Wormgoor marks a major sea change. He’s big and tall
and when he plays the first thing you notice is that he is not skilful.
There are a thousand players like him in England – he’s like Tony Adams
– but Ajax have never signed a player like this, so it’s a very
interesting development.”
In the post-Bosman era, many clubs in Europe gave up on youth
development. Why develop your own players only to see them sign for
another club when they turn 18? This prompted UEFA to insist clubs
include a certain number of homegrown players in their squad. But
because the EU does not allow discrimination by nationality, clubs can
get around the rules. If anything, the directive has encouraged bigger
clubs to poach players from other countries at an even younger age. No
prizes for guessing which country is the worst culprit...
“Everywhere I go I see scouts from England,” says Edward Sturing.
“Surely it’s better to develop your own players instead of taking ours?
England is a big country, with a big passion for football, so surely
there are a lot of talented boys there? It’s just lazy, but because
they have money they just buy the talent.”
Not that Sturing is downbeat. “We’re very lucky in Holland,” he says.
“Maybe if we had lots of money and a big population we wouldn’t work so
hard on developing players. But that is why our national team is number
six in the world.”
England, meanwhile, are two places lower and the two countries’
records at major tournaments in the last 20 years is also worth
considering. In the European Championships, Holland have one title and
have reached three semi-finals; England have made it to one semi-final.
Their World Cup records are level, with one semi-final apiece, but with
populations of 60 million and 15 million, it’s not exactly comparing
like for like.
It seems that English clubs are unable or unwilling to put their
efforts into developing homegrown talent, and instead adopt the role of
football imperialists, determined to assert their influence around the
globe. PSV Eindhoven are morphing into a feeder club for Chelsea,
Arsenal have Belgian side Beveren, while Liverpool are tightening their
grip on Antiguoko.
Just as rising sea levels are giving Holland’s landscape planners
headaches, the globalisation of the game in the post-Bosman era is
giving Dutch football even bigger obstacles. But they have a plan.
Before 2011, Ajax want to increase turnover by six percent every year,
return to the top 16 of clubs in Europe and win the Dutch championship
once every two years. The club’s main ambition, though, is to win the
Champions League again.
“In the mid-1960s nobody in the world would have believed that Ajax
could win the European Cup,” says David Endt, former Ajax player and
current team manager. “But to everyone’s amazement we won it three
times. In the 1980s people were again saying Ajax could never win a
European title again, but in 1987 we won the Cup Winners’ Cup, in 1992
we won the UEFA Cup and in 1995 we won the Champions League. Now we are
in a period where everybody is again saying we won’t succeed in Europe.
But this club will always find a way to spring a surprise.”
If they do return to the top of the European game it will not be
achieved by purchasing success, but by making the most of the talent on
their doorstep. As they say in Holland “No Youth, No Future.”
|